No
longer a concern for the world’s most popular smartphone, Apple’s
always-beloved iPhone has finally been outfitted with 4G LTE
connectivity to present itself in the same light as some of its renowned
rivals in the landscape. Naturally, the ability to browse the web is
arguably one of the most prized features with today’s modern
smartphones, as they can now take advantage of speedy LTE networks
littered throughout the world. However, if we take cellular connectivity
out of the equation, mainly because LTE isn’t prevalent in many
markets, we’re pitting some of the best smartphones out now against one
another to find out exactly which one provides us with the most balanced
experience.
On tap for this web browsing comparison, we’ve got the
Apple iPhone 5,
Samsung Galaxy S III,
HTC One X, and the
Nokia Lumia 900.
Broadening the scope as usual, all three major platforms are well
represented in this faceoff – giving us a good idea on how they all
perform against one another. In addition to the customary benchmark
tests, which gives us insights to their technical prowess, there are
other factors that we explain that help to refine and complement the
true web browsing experience we desperately crave. So without any
further ado, let’s dive in and see what these beauties have to offer.
The Contenders:
- Safari (iPhone 5)
- ICS Stock Android Browser (Galaxy S III and One X)
- Internet Explorer (Lumia 900)
Benchmarks:
|
BrowserMark |
Ringmark (features/tests) |
Apple iPhone 5 |
186,755 |
55/263 |
Samsung Galaxy S III |
103,091 |
55/236 |
HTC One X |
96,118 |
55/236 |
Nokia Lumia 900 |
31,862 |
26/95 |
Before we dive right into the nitty and gritty, we decided to run a
couple of browser benchmark tests to show us on paper how this quartet
fares against one another. However, as we should point out before
proceeding, it’s worth knowing that these benchmark tests don’t
necessarily represent the true performance of these browsers on an
everyday, normal basis. First up on the chopping block is Ringmark,
which basically checks whether a specific browser supports a variety of
basic and advanced protocols/technologies that many apps nowadays rely
on – such as HTML 5. Meanwhile, Browsermark works on the same premise,
since it measures the performance of things like CSS, HTML5, JavaScript,
and WebGL. Although the iPhone 5, Samsung Galaxy S III, and HTC One X
all perform almost similarly to one another with Ringmark, while the
Nokia Lumia 900 seems to be left in the dust, it’s Apple’s pride and joy
that blows away the competition in the Browsermark benchmark test.
Page Loads:
|
PhoneArena.com |
NYTimes.com |
NationalGeographic.com |
IMDB.com |
Average |
iPhone 5 |
17.1s |
7,5s |
9,9s |
5,6s |
10,02s |
Galaxy S III |
30.7s |
6,8s |
8,1s |
5,9s |
12,87s |
Galaxy S III (no flash) |
20.5s |
3,8s |
2,6s |
4,5s |
7,85s |
One X |
1min7s |
30,8s |
8,9s |
7,5s |
28,55s |
One X (no flash) |
50.2s |
4,8s |
3,7s |
3,8s |
15,62s |
Lumia 900 |
53.5s |
14,9s |
30,8s |
19,3s |
29,62s |
Alrighty folks, without question, the first thing we have to check
out before anything else, which is also probably the most important item
with most people, is none other than page loads. As we all know too
well, all four smartphones are 4G LTE capable, but seeing there are many
discrepancies that can arise from that, we decided to test out page
loads via Wi-Fi connectivity – to make it a bit more fair, since it’s
relying on the same connection. One by one, we loaded up our web site
and some other highly visited ones as well, to see how they fare against
one another.
Amazingly, it seems as though the iPhone 5 and
Galaxy S III cough up the fastest speeds, while the Nokia Lumia 900
seems to take a significant amount of time with most of the sites we
checked out. Strangely though, the HTC One X took an extraordinary
amount of time loading our web site, but didn’t seem too strained by the
others. Worth noting in this comparison, we had both Android
smartphones enabled for Adobe Flash support, which of course,
contributes to longer times than its Flash-less rivals in Safari and
Internet Explorer.
Navigational Controls:If
there’s one thing we can agree upon with all four devices, we have to
say that navigational control is no problem whatsoever with them. In
fact, all four smartphones are soundly responsive with their navigation –
providing that oh-so lovable amount of movement with things such as
kinetic scrolling and pinch zooming. However, considering we have to be a
bit more meticulous comparing the four, we find the HTC One X dishing
up the least amount of fluidity with its performance. Honestly, it’s not
bad at all and almost negligible, but when the other three handsets
exhibit buttery smooth executions, the HTC One X’s minor blemish does
stand out a bit more.
Rendering on the go:Showing
no pause or delay with its rendering of complex web sites, both the
Apple iPhone 5 and Samsung Galaxy S III take a commanding lead in this
department, as they’re both adept in rendering on the fly. Whether it’s
zooming in/out or merely scrolling to the bottom of a page like a mad
man, these two class-leading smartphones are supremely quick in
rendering text and various multimedia content. With Internet Explorer on
the Nokia Lumia 900, it maintains a very similar performance, but on
very few occasions, there is a slight delay before it’s able to render –
resulting in a one-second delay in displaying items on-screen.
Unfortunately for HTC’s flagship, it clearly has some nagging hitches to
its rendering performance, since it’s occasionally delayed.
Specifically, it’s most noticeable when pinch zooming with its blinking
like actions.
Real Estate & Detail:In
terms of details and clarity, the iPhone 5 undoubtedly has the edge
there with its highest pixel density amongst the bunch – while the Nokia
Lumia 900’s WVGA resolution softens things up tremendously. And of
course, with the two Android smartphones in this comparison, they have
the balanced combination of high resolutions and large screen sizes to
make them the ideal candidates.
Other Noteworthy Features:Indeed,
a lot of emphasis is placed on each handset’s web browsing performance,
since as we all know, it’s the bread and butter in what makes the
experience so meaningful. Still, there are other tertiary features that
aid to complement the experience. With the two Android smartphones, they
have support for Adobe Flash to give them that desktop-like experience.
Yes, Adobe’s long famous multimedia platform has already made its
exodus from the Android scene, but nevertheless, it’s available on these
two beauties.
Interestingly enough, all four smartphones employ
their own interpretation with sharing functionality – like being able to
share a page via Twitter, Facebook, email, text, etc. However, the
Samsung Galaxy S III and HTC One X boast the deepest level of sharing
versus the bunch, since they’re Android devices and all. Additionally,
with the exception of the Nokia Lumia 900, all the other smartphones
have a “Reading Mode” that makes pages easier to read.
Conclusion:Here
we are, at the end of a long journey finding out exactly which handset
packs along the overall best web browsing experience. Taking all things
into consideration, we have to say that the most balanced device for the
occasion, has to be Samsung’s offering in the Galaxy S III – though,
all are undeniably proficient with the job on hand. Speedy load times,
admirable benchmark scores, ginormous display, deep sharing
functionality, and a high resolution display pushes the Samsung Galaxy S
III just a smidgen ahead of its rivals. Being the new kid on the block,
the iPhone 5 flexes its muscles with its commanding benchmark scores,
superb details, and speedy performance – making it a great all-around
performer as well. Obviously, seeing it’s part of the Android family,
the HTC One X is still a wonderful device as well, but there are some
rendering issues that prevent it from rising higher. And finally,
there’s the sole Windows Phone included in the mix, the Nokia Lumia 900,
which is capable of getting the job done – albeit, it doesn’t push the
envelope as much as its competitors.